Anaesthesia‐free Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy In Patients With Renal Calculi

Below is result for Anaesthesia‐free Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy In Patients With Renal Calculi in PDF format. You can download or read online all document for free, but please respect copyrighted ebooks. This site does not host PDF files, all document are the property of their respective owners.

Clinical experience with shock-wave lithotripsy using the

Results: Between May 2007 and November 2009, 698 patients with renal stones and 448 with ure-teric stones underwent extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The mean (SD) renal stone size was 12.8 (3.8) mm; a mean of 1.36 sessions was required, with a mean (SD) number of 3744 (1961) shocks delivered per renal stone.

Experience with 395 extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in

Monotherapy of staghorn renal calculi a comparative study between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and extracorporeal shock­ wave lithotripsy. Journal of Urology, 1988; 139: 895-899. 15. Kahnoski RJ, Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Steela RE and Mosbaugh PG: Combined percutaneous and extracorporeal shockwave

Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Comparison of Ureteroscopic

complications of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL)* and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS) in the treatment of ureteral stones. Methods: Between March 2001 and July 20034, 124 patients with symptomatic ureteral calculi treated with URS and the other 91 with ESWL. In the ESWL group, PCK stonelith

EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY MONOTHERAPY FOR

Objective: To define a subgroup of staghorn stones that is amenable to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy and review the need for prophylactic ureteric stents. Methods: Fifty-eight renal units with staghorn calculi in 56 patients (30 males and 26 females) were treated by ESWL monotherapy on the EDAP LT -01 lithotripter.

A Prospective Randomised Trial Comparing the Modified HM3

2. Patients and methods From April 2006 to March 2008, all patients >18 yr of age requiring elective or emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for previously untreated urinary stones (n = 903) were randomly assigned for treatment with either the HM3 (n = 405) or MODULITH1 SLX-F2 (n = 415) lithotripter.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY - LMU

Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy or Extracorporeal Lithotripsy? Comparison of Costs and Results F. Sofras, A. Karayannis, J. Kastriotis, G. Vlassopoulos and C. Dimopoulos 15 Anaesthesia-free Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotropsy in Patients with Renal Calculi H. Vandeursen, B. Tjandramaga, R. Verbesselt, G. Smet and L. Baert 18