How Does Scopus Rank Compared To Web Of Science

Below is result for How Does Scopus Rank Compared To Web Of Science in PDF format. You can download or read online all document for free, but please respect copyrighted ebooks. This site does not host PDF files, all document are the property of their respective owners.

Choosing the proper database(s) for dental researchers: WOS

consider (PsycINFO, EMBASE etc.), due to the fact that Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) are the most popular and extensive interdisciplinary databases with extensive medical literature coverage, the focus of this research project is to compare Medline with Scopus and Web of Science (WOS). This research intends to address the


Although several studies have compared the WoS and Scopus for Web use y = 1.164x Rank of Countries in Scopus (papers) 0.992 R2 Scopus, Web of Science,

Does the rate of orthodontic tooth movement change during

Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Arab World Research Source,, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global). We searched for studies comparing quantitatively the amount of orthodontic tooth movement between pregnant/lactating or not animals. Following retrieval and

Journal Citation Reports and Scopus

Further, for 14 journals out of 20 impact factor based on Scopus data is greater than JCR figures, for 6 journals vice versa. If we sort journals according to Scopus IF, they will notably change their rankings, as shows Figure 2. There are JCR ranks in the left column and Scopus ranks in the right. Arrows show shift of journal positions.

Frequently Asked Questions - Rowan University

17.Will Scopus provide journal rankings? 18.What impact will this have on the science publishing industry? D. How and when the metrics are calculated in Scopus 19.For which source types will metrics be calculated? 20. How will Scopus handle new journals? 21.How will Scopus handle discontinued journals? 22. How will Scopus handle name changes

Journal citation reports ranking

the Scopus rank for ecology titles. Both Web of Science and Scopus indexed 10 articles for the journal from 2005 to 2006, so incomplete indexing by Scopus can't be the cause of the difference. Using the create citation report feature in Web of Science, we got only 10 cites for Wildlife Monographs compared to the 39 listed in JCR.

of Alexander Technological Educational Institute of The new

citations and altmetrics, with Google scholar, the Scopus database and Web of Science database. Survey on Scimago Journal and Country Rank: we analyzed the citations of the journals in subject category Library and Information Science , regarding the bibliometrics and the altmetrics.

Microsoft Academic: A multidisciplinary comparison of

2017) and analyses of large groups of researchers (Science-Metrix, 2015). Given this potential it is important to compare the coverage of Microsoft Academic with that of other citation indexes, such as Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science (WoS) to evaluate its suitability as a scientometric data source (Harzing, 2016).


compared citations recorded by Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science and found that Google Scholar included 94% of citations, the Web of Science 35% and Scopus 43% of citations. Furthermore, citation databases tend to be biased towards English language journals (Mongeon and Paul-Hus, 2016).

Categorization of E-learning as an emerging discipline in the

Keywords: E-learning, Bibliometric, Map of science, SCOPUS, SCImago Journal & Country Rank Introduction E-learning, short for electronic learning , arises as a name for the advances that have been made in education through the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and in particular the internet.

Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of

Source: Scopus data compiled by Science-Metrix, and WoS data by OST Figure 2. Percentage of variation in countries ranks when using WoS and Scopus, 1996 2007 Source: Scopus data compiled by Science-Metrix, and WoS data by OST However, these correlations might be high only because the time period considered is fairly long and

Science Maps of Global and Indian Wildlife Forensics: A

forum, in the broadest sense, and forensic science can be defined as the methods of science applied to public matters. Hence, forensic science does not necessarily have to do with crime, but the term has evolved in modern times to refer to the application of science to court or criminal matters.

SCOPUS citation analysis of publications from Saudi dental

The SCOPUS database was developed by Elsevier, combining the characteristics of both PubMed and Web of Science. These combined characteristics allow for enhanced utility, both for medical literature research and academic needs (citation analysis), yet access to the database is not free.

A Citation and Co- Citation Analysis of 10 Years of KM Theory

3 Data analysis and results Table 1 reports the citation counts for the KMRP articles. Counts were taken from Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus, while reads were taken from Mendeley.

Beinghighlyprolificinacademicscience:characteristics of

advantages of large numbers of cases from Scopus or Web of Science databases and enrich understandings. They point to the role of gender, institutional type, number of collaborators,

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections

for literature searches. It seems that two most extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide a

A Comparative Study of High-quality Academic Journals in

his study compared the characteristics of the top-ten, multidisci-plinary, academic journals, as ranked by the SCImago Journal & Country Rank database in 2014, in Southeast Asia (we used ASEAN, ex-Sin-gapore, as a proxy for Southeast Asia) Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology (TH), Sains Malaysiana (MY), Walailak Journal of Science

Journal Quality in Mathematics Education

Apr 26, 2016 to a greater range of journals. In 2004, Elsevier launched the Scopus database as an alternative to the ISI Web of Science (home of the aforementioned SCI and SSCI). Using this new resource, the SCImago research group, a joint venture of four Spanish universities, developed the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator

Chapter 5 Innovation Capability of Thailand s Automotive

Compared with other ASEAN countries, Japan and India, Thailand s car exports rank No. 2 after Japan s and are followed by India s, as shown in Table 5. It is noted that the Thai car exports value gradually increased from 2001 to 2008, dropping in 2009. Then it increased again in 2010.

FWCI - Field Weighted Citation Impact

cited n or more times by other items index by the particular product being used (Scopus, Web of Science, etc.) Pros Is focused on the impact of an individual researcher, rather than on venue of publication. Cons Not recommended as an indicator of research performance, use with care to make

A Comparison Study of Impact Factor in Web of Science and

selected journals indexed both in Web of Science and Scopus is extremely similar. A significant relationship exists between Web of Science and Scopus for selected journals ranks in impact fac-tor. Keywords: Impact Factor, Engineering education, Educational Technology, Scopus, Web of Sci-ence Introduction

Does dirty data affect google scholar citations?

are readily available on the web, it generates somewhat higher citation metrics than those of proprietary databases of Thomson Reuters Web of Science and Elsevier s Scopus. This paper investigated the extent of duplicate publications and citations in GS database and their impact on GS citation metrics. Findings indicate that 16% of

Using Google Scholar to Estimate the Impact of Journal

tive or complement to the Web of Science and Scopus for measuring the impact of journal articles in education. Three handbooks on research in science education, language education, and educational technology were used to identify a sample of 1 1 2 accomplished scholars. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus citations for

Finding Influential Journals: Scopus and Scimago

SCImago Journal and Country Rank (SJR) is a free service that uses the same data as the Compare Journals tool in Scopus. Whilst Scopus only allows you to compare individual journal titles, SJR allows you to look at all the journals from a particular subject area (in the same way as Web of Science Journal Citation Reports).

On the relation between the WoS impact factor, the

SCImago s h-index and PageRank. The SCImago Journal Rank turns out to be an equivalent of the Impact Factor for the Scopus domain. This is rather surprising as it is a derivative of the Pinski-Narin influence weight (Pinski & Narin, 1976), and as such closely related to PageRank. Leydesdorff does not include

Methods employed in the 'Web of Science' and 'Scopus

Keywords: Citation, evaluation, impact factor, Scimago Journal Rank, Scopus, Web of Science. Thomson Reuters' Web of Science (WoS), Elsevier's Sco pus and Google's Scholar are the major online databases that serve as platforms to evaluate the impact of the sci entific journals. WoS and Scopus are fee-based services, while Google Scholar is an

How does access to this work benefit you? Let us know!

Jun 21, 2018 databases, Web of Science and Scopus, were identified using different methods. Comparing by subject category shows that Scopus has hundreds of unique titles, and Web of Science just 16. The titles unique to each database have low SCImago Journal Rank Indicators (Scopus) and Impact

Measuring Nursing Faculty Impact: Web of Science versus Scopus

II. Scopus indicated a larger faculty h-index when compared to Web of Science data. i. 46% of the Nursing faculty had a higher h-index using Scopus data. ii. 49% showed no change in h-index between the two databases. iii. 6% had a higher h-index when using Web of Science data. a. Each of these authors published in the late 1980s or early 1990s. b.

Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for Earth

databases, search results from this database is compared with Thomson s ISI WoS (Institute for Scientific Information, Web of Science). For earth science literature 85% of documents indexed by ISI WoS were recalled by Google Scholar. The rank of records displayed in Google Scholar and ISI WoS, is compared by means of Spearman s footrule

A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections

Figure 2 shows the search screen of WOS and Scopus databases. Figure 2. Web of Science and Scopus search screen The analysis of search results is competitive characteristics of these two databases. Therefore, these databases attempt to improve their features to make searching easier for users. For example, WOS is able to create

A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science

(Norris and Oppenheim, 2007) CSA Illumina, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar social sciences (Bar-Ilan et al., 2007) Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar difierent disciplines (Meho and Yang, 2007) Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar library and information science (Kousha and Thelwall, 2008) Web of Science and Google Scholar

Google Scholar s Ranking Algorithm: An Introductory Overview

other academic search engines such as Scopus and Web of Science [1, 2], Google Scholar s coverage of the literature in general and in certain research fields [3, 4], the suitability to use Google Scholar s citation counts for calculating indices such as the h-index [5] and the

Author's personal copy - SCImago Journal Rank

and Country Rank website, an open access scientometric directory with almost 19,000 scientific journals and other types of publication (2009). 2. Data We used Scopus as the data source for the development of the SJR2 indicator because it best represents the overall structure of world science at a global scale.

Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained - Science-Metrix

ies compared the bibliometric rankings obtained.1 Given the limitations of the databases Web versions for producing 1More often than not, these studies also included Google Scholar. Given that this database is not yet suitable for compiling macrolevel bibliometric data, this paper compares only Scopus and theWeb of Science.

Scopus is the A&I Database of Choice Among Users throughout

93% agree that it is easier to refine, sort and rank Scopus search results than those on Web of Science 93% agree that they prefer Scopus over Web of Science 92% agree that the number of titles and publishers indexed by Scopus is more than Web of Science 92% agree that Scopus delivers more relevant search results when compared to Web of Science

ResearchGate vs. Google Scholar: Which finds more early

more than both Scopus and Web of Science. Scopus found more citations than did WoS, although this excludes th e results for 155 articles not indexed in Scopus ( the

Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities

attacks. Within the text, they are humiliated as the weird others and compared to bubbles on earth. To this date, people have the tendency to marginalize and discriminate women who posit their individuality in their socially reclusive lifestyle. While analyzing their character from a Feminist perspective, the paper will explore

Database Comparison between Web of Science and Scopus: A Case

educational technology journals indexed both in Web of Science and Scopus. Through the statistical analysis, no significant difference is found for indexed journals Impact Factor and h-index ranking in Web of Science and Scopus. A strong positive relationship exists between Web of Science and Scopus rank.

CORRESPONDENCE Open Access Citation analysis of orthopaedic

PageRank algorithm to the Scopus database to produce the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator. The SJR represents awarded prestige per article in the analysed year and is calculated using a complicated iterative for-mula. Self-citations do not contribute to the SJR, since a journal can receive prestige only from other journals, not from itself [8].

Comparison between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Score, and

Rank indicator (SJR), of mainstream Anatomy and Morphology journals in 2014. Specific anatomical and morphological journals wer e selected from Anatomy & Morphology category of Web of Science.