Patient Preferences And Adherence To Colorectal Cancer Screening In An Urban Population

Below is result for Patient Preferences And Adherence To Colorectal Cancer Screening In An Urban Population in PDF format. You can download or read online all document for free, but please respect copyrighted ebooks. This site does not host PDF files, all document are the property of their respective owners.

& Prevention 34th Annual Meeting American Society of

Conclusion: Obesity screening and a structured low-intensity behavioral counseling by educators was feasi-ble and reached 33% of obese patients in the practice. PACE+ evaluation in the EMR provides retrievable and measurable information about patient stage of change, preferences and perceived adherence barriers.

2011 Dialogue for Action Poster Session

The intention is to increase colorectal cancer screening and, thereby reduce high colorectal cancer rates in the Northern Plains American Indian population. Contact: Karen Workman, BS, PhD(c), [email protected] Poster 5 Title: The Twists and Turns of Colorectal Screening: The Role of the Patient Navigator Submitted by: Andrea Dwyer, BS1 1.

SC1 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF SCREENING AND STATIN THERAPY IN

PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR COLORECTAL CANCER (CRC) SCREENING STRATEGIES Marshall DA1, Marshall JK1, Phillips KA2, Johnson RF3,Thabane L1, Foster G1, O Brien B1 1McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA;3Research Triangle Institute, NC, USA The success of population screening for

Risk assessment and clinical decision making for colorectal

increasing adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, yet pri-mary care providers (PCPs) are often reluctant to comply with patient preferences if they differ from their own. Risk stratification advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) provides a rational strategy for reconciling these differences.

Programme Book of the 85th EGPRN Meeting, Dublin-Ireland, 19

based screening for prostate cancer: a two-year follow-up cohort study of French men over the age of 40 years. 50 Effect of physician notification regarding non-adherence to colorectal cancer screening on patient participation in fecal cancer screening: A randomized clinical trial.

What is the best way for providers to ask patients about

Keywords: colorectal cancer, urban population, screening, physician-patient relations BACKGROUND Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of new cancer cases in USA CRC is the second leading cause of death in USA (50,310 in 2014) African-Americans more likely to die from CRC than other ethnicities

Willingness to Pay for CT Colonography: A Survey of Patient

S creening for colorectal cancer is recommended every 5 10 years beginning at 50 years of age [1]. Approximately 40% of Ameri-cans 50 75 years old do not adhere to the rec-ommendations [2]. Public health research has focused on patient preferences with regard to type of screening [3] and both expected and experienced burdens on patients [4].

: Practice-based Research Networks: Advancing Research and

Cancer Screening as Part of Population Health Management: Improving colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates for patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds is a recognized public health priority. This study sought to determine if implementation of a system-wide screening intervention could reduce disparities in the

CEA, CBA, Outcomes Research & Health Policy

Statin adherence was measured as pill days covered in the IADB.nl pharmacy research database. Cost-effectiveness was measured in costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) from the health care payers' perspective. RESULTS: For an average patient aged 60 years, the base case, statin treatment was highly cost-effective at €2245 per QALY.

EUPHA Newsletter 11 2017 Published: 30 November 2017 2

Screening The importance of people's values and preferences for colorectal cancer screening participation Kaisa Fritzell; Kerstin Stake Nilsson; Anna Jervaeus; Rolf Hultcrantz; Yvonne Wengström [Article] Perception and use of Pap smear screening among rural and urban women in Romania

EDITORIAL - HKMJ

breast cancer.9-12 At present, the cervical screening programme and the colorectal cancer screening programme are the two territory-wide strategies regularised in Hong Kong based on current evidence.1 It is recommended that Hong Kong individuals aged 50 to 75 years with average risk for colorectal cancer

Boletín de Artículos Científicos

MEASURES: Rates of prostate, breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. RESULTS: In participants with very high mortality risk, 31% to 55% received recent cancer screening, with prostate cancer screening being most common (55%). For women who had a hysterectomy for benign reasons, 34% to 56% had a Papanicolaou test within the past 3 years.

Does Decision Support by Phone Increase Colorectal Cancer

Background: The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rate among Hispanics in the United States is low. There is a need for research to develop effective, evidence-based intervention methods that can increase CRC screening among eligible individuals in this population.

Cost‐Effectiveness of Patient Navigation to Increase

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underused by minority populations, and patient navigation increases adherence with screening colonoscopy. In this study, the authors estimated the cost-effectiveness of navigation for screening colonoscopy from the perspective of a payer seeking to improve population health.

Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on Promoting Adherence

HIV-negative patient with neoplastic lesions. Th e HIV-positive patients were more likely to have adenomatous polyps 6 9 mm in diameter, two or more adenomatous polyps, advanced neoplastic lesions, and adenocarcinoma. 8 C olon cancer screening guidelines to detect polyps and cancer The 2010 2011 US Preventive Services Task Force

PCORI Funding Awards: Cycle III and Inaugural Improving

Lauren A. McCormack, PhD Measuring Patient-Centered Communication for Colorectal Cancer Care and Research 53 Scott D. Ramsey, PhD, MD A Structured Approach to Prioritizing Cancer Research Using Stakeholders and Value of Information 54 David B. Reuben, MD Developing Patient-Centered Outcomes for Dementia: Goal Setting and Attainment 41

APPENDIX A. SEARCH STRATEGIES

Davis TC, et al. Contrasts in Rural and Urban Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Health Behav. 2013; 37(3):289-298 Dolan 2005. Not RCT (secondary observational study from included Dolan 2002) Dolan JG. Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions. Health Expect. 2005;8(4):334-44. Dorfman 2010. Not RCT (development

Women's Environmental Scan Project

Supporting Agency: National Cancer Institute (NCI), US Initial Year: 1998/09 Final Year: 2003/03 Background: Certain cancer screening tests are effective in early detection, most notably, the tests used for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. These tests, all of which are

Low rates of diagnostic colonoscopy in Federally Qualified

to Achieve the Promise of Colorectal Cancer Screening Ronald E. Myers, DSW, PhD Almost 15 years ago, a review by Yabroff et al1 reported that incomplete follow up abnormal breast cancer, cervical cancer, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests with a complete diagnostic evaluation (CDE) was common in primary care.

Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer

Using the NCI's Survey of Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices as a model [24], the 21 -item survey was con-structed to include questions on CRC screening preferences and practices, use of colorectal screening guidelines, per-sonal colorectal screening history, colorectal screening barriers, and practice and personal characteristics. We

Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 308 318 A Framework for Guiding Health

improper adherence to medical regimens for human immunodeficiency virus, self-efficacy mediated this relationship.25 Finally, SCT/self-efficacy provided the theoretical underpin-nings for a recent health literacy study that examined the relationship between diabetes, self-efficacy, and self-management behavior in an urban, diverse, low-income

Publications Corey Hannah Basch (formerly Brouse)

10. Wolf RL, Basch CE, Brouse CH, Shmukler C, Shea S. Patient preferences and adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an urban population. American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96 (5) 809-11. PMID: 16571715 11. Basch CE, Wolf RL, Brouse CH, Shmukler C, Neugut A, DeCarlo L, Shea S. Telephone

Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening among Racially

ences may increase screening adherence. Key Words: preferences, colorectal. cancer screening, conjoint analysis (Med Care 2008;46: S10-S16) Recent data show that although rates of CRC screening have increased, less than half of the eligible US popula-tion is up-to-date with screening guidelines.1 3 Moreover,

[ News May 25, 2012 Vol. 34 No. 10 OncOlOgy

American Indians to get colorectal cancer screenings in an attempt to reduce screening disparities among the urban and reservation American Indian population Sarah J. Miller, PsyD, of Mount Sinai School of Medicine, will test using motivational interviewing tech-niques to increase future colonoscopy adherence among African Americans to

Limitations of the S-TOFHLA in measuring poor numeracy: a

the use of decision aids in colorectal cancer screening. Eligible participants were English-speaking, aged 45 75 years, and had no history of colorectal cancer. Partici-pants were recruited in person between November 2012 and January 2013 in the Greater Houston Metropolitan area from: [1] a large academic cancer center and [2]a

SC4 ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF SCREENING FOR THE A-ADDUCIN GENE

PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR COLORECTAL CANCER (CRC) SCREENING STRATEGIES Marshall DA1, Marshall JK1, Phillips KA2, Johnson RF3,Thabane L1, Foster G1, O Brien B1 1McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA;3Research Triangle Institute, NC, USA The success of population screening for

Health Education and Behaviour Theme Section: Cancer and

Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latinos in Three Communities on the Texas Mexico Border Screening per il cancro del colon-retto nei Latinos in tre comunità al confine del Texas con il Messico María E. Fernández, Lara S. Savas, Katherine M. Wilson, Theresa L. Byrd, John Atkinson, Isabel Torres-Vigil, and Sally W. Vernon

Derek S. Brown

May 01, 2018 Colorectal cancer screening: preferences, past behavior, and future intentions. Forthcoming, The Patient. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-018-0308-6 testing preferences in an

Derek S. Brown

Feb 17, 2019 Colorectal cancer screening: preferences, past behavior, and future intentions. population with diabetes in the United States, 2011-2012. testing preferences

Understanding diffusion of evidence-based community cancer

population groups in the United States as cancer health disparities (NCI, 2016b). Disparities are associated with unequal access to high-quality care (Siegel, et al., 2016), such that where patients live and where cancer care is available makes a difference.

Analysis of Barriers to and Patients' Preferences for CT

gone at least one colorectal cancer screening study [7 10]. As a consequence, the impact of CTC on patient adherence to colorectal can­ cer screening recommendations is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate pa­ tients barriers against colorectal cancer screen­ ing tests and, specifically, patients preferences

Optimizing Colorectal Cancer Screening by Getting FIT Right

tive immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening by Wilschut JA, Hol L, Dekker E, et al, on page 1648. O ver the last 4 decades, there have been declines in US colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence from 59.5 per 100,000 population in 1975 to 44.7 in 2007 and in the CRC death rate from 28.6 per 100,000 population in 1976

Review Article

screening in the multivariate analysis (OR 3.5, 95% CI (3.2 3.8)) regardless of the screening strategy used. Adherence to other cancer screening behaviours such as prostate cancer screening in men or breast cancer in women has also been positively associated with CRC screening uptake and specific studies have already been carried out [44

Master of Public Health Capstone Presentations May 9, 2020

Ryan Koski-Vacirca Patient welfare: analyzing three federal surprise medical billing solutions Neha Misra Determining a relationship between severity of cicatricial disease and severity of trichiasis in a hyper endemic district of Tanzania Bernardo Pessoa Secondary ovarian cancer from colorectal metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Publications from 2001-2016 Corey Hannah Basch (formerly

10. Wolf RL, Basch CE, Brouse CH, Shmukler C, Shea S. Patient preferences and adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an urban population. American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96 (5) 809-11. PMID: 16571715 11. Basch CE, Wolf RL, Brouse CH, Shmukler C, Neugut A, DeCarlo L, Shea S. Telephone

Nazir CV for website - kumc.edu

Colorectal cancer screening behaviors among American Indians in the Midwest. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, Vol 4 (2): 35 40 (Fall 2010). 39. Averett E, Nazir N, Neuberger JS. Evaluation of a Local Health Department s Food Handler Training Program. Journal of Environmental Health, 73 (6): 65 9 (Jan 2011). 40.